Re-inspection lands Dr Reddy’s Form 483 with 13 observations at Duvvada plant

By Dan Stanton contact

- Last updated on GMT

Image: iStock/Golden_Brown
Image: iStock/Golden_Brown

Related tags: Dr reddy, Food and drug administration, Andhra pradesh

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories says it is addressing the observations at its Duvvada plant which was hit with a warning letter in 2015.

In a Bombay Stock Exchange filing, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories announced an audit at its Duvvada, Visakhapatnam facility – in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh – was completed today and resulted in a Form 483 with 13 observations.

Spokesman Calvin Printer told in-Pharmatechnologist.com the visit by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was a re-inspection after the plant was subject to a warning letter​ in November 2015.

“Our priority is to respond to the observations as fast as we can,”​ he told us, though was unable to divulge details of the Agency’s criticisms. “We are still in the process of validating the observations.”

The firm has 15 business days to reply to the FDA.

Previous warning

The Duvvada plant, a finished formulation facility for oncology drugs, was one of three Indian sites hit with the 2015 warning; the other two were active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) facilities in Srikakulam (also in Andhra Pradesh) and Tripuraram (Telangana).

Last month​, the Miryalaguda, Tripuraram plant was issued with an FDA Form 483 with three observations, following a re-inspection.

The FDA found significant violations of cGMP at Duvvada. These included malfunction of equipment, an example being an operator repeatedly using forceps to manually assist the transportation of vials along a conveyor belt.

“You did not simulate these critical manual interventions during media fills, so you have no basis to know whether they may compromise the sterility of your products,”​ the Agency said at the time.

 “Even though your senior management was notified of this failure, you did not initiate an incident report to investigate the equipment malfunction or determine the effects of this discrepancy on the quality of the product until we concluded our inspection and issued a Form 483.”

The Agency also cited failures in following written procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile, and written procedures in production and process controls designed to ensure purity.

“Parenteral drugs must be essentially free of particulates. However, during the inspection, we observed that your procedure for qualifying the operators who perform visual inspection is unacceptable because you did not document the creation of inspectors’ qualification kits.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

How to resolve sticking issues in tablet production

How to resolve sticking issues in tablet production

I Holland Limited - Tabletting Science | 24-Jun-2019 | Case Study

Tablet sticking is one of the most common problems in tablet manufacture. Find out how I Holland used the TSAR scientific predictive model and expert tablet...

How to measure powder and granule flow properties

How to measure powder and granule flow properties

Stable Micro Systems | 01-Apr-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Being able to predict, optimise and control powder flow is of prime importance to manufacturers in ensuring high quality standards. Download this free...

The battle of performance in pharma production

The battle of performance in pharma production

Telstar Life Science Solutions | 26-Mar-2019 | Case Study

Telstar case study. Discover how a versatile freeze-dryer automatic loading & unloading systemDiscover how a versatile freeze-dryer automatic loading...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more